|
Post by makopp5 on Aug 1, 2016 15:44:19 GMT -5
scumbuster,
this is from 2008.
Khan is giving a hard time to Trump
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 1, 2016 16:28:25 GMT -5
Assange said today he is going to drop the emails he has on hillary in 3 batches between now and Nov.I t will be fun if he does and is not blowing smoke.
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 1, 2016 16:37:19 GMT -5
makoop5 Khan now that there has been some time to investigate him in the news today he has ties all over hillary and the musilim brotherhood and Saudis.He worked in the same law firm as the firm that handles all of hillarys taxes and he has a law firm that handles nothing but visas for investment to get people around the problem of immagration.
I think the Dems have not figured out that Trump and his voters are not going to take hillarys lies and BS and just lay down like romney and mccain did.
|
|
|
Post by makopp5 on Aug 1, 2016 17:56:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by billyb on Aug 1, 2016 18:12:26 GMT -5
Somebody has those deleted 33,000 Shillary emails, it is just a matter of if and when they want to release them. Methinks the old skank does not sleep well at night thinking of when the other shoe will drop.
|
|
|
Post by wildstubby on Aug 1, 2016 18:15:44 GMT -5
With not only Michael Bloomburg being her megaphone, apparently, Warren Buffet and some other Wall St. folks are standing on her soapbox. I'm sure this will really sit well with Bernie's people as she is taking money from the very people who they despise!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2016 21:14:16 GMT -5
I look for WikiLeaks to release some documents from Hillary's server right before the election showing her system had been breached and putting classified security documents in Russia's hands. . Yeah for sure, she is an other Ethel Rosenberg.
|
|
|
Post by livinginmedellin on Aug 1, 2016 21:14:51 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 1, 2016 21:19:29 GMT -5
Assange said today he is going to drop the emails he has on hillary in 3 batches between now and Nov.I t will be fun if he does and is not blowing smoke. Women always give themselves away when they start talking or writing e-mails, they don't know when to keep their mouth shut.
|
|
|
Post by makopp5 on Aug 2, 2016 16:36:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 6, 2016 7:55:17 GMT -5
Democrats fear 'October surprise' as White House ponders hack response As Hillary Clinton supporters fret about a WikiLeaks “October surprise,” dozens of defense and security experts from both parties are urging the Obama administration to take tough action if it concludes that Russia orchestrated a series of cyberattacks on the Democratic Party. But based on past U.S. handling of foreign-sponsored cyberassaults, it could take months or even years to mount such a response — action that could encompass anything from public shaming or economic sanctions to indictments or retaliatory hacking. Even the most optimistic timeline, according to interviews with former security and law enforcement officials, could delay a forceful U.S. reprisal until just weeks before the very presidential election that the hackers may be trying to influence. “I’m sure they’re cognizant of [the] timeline,” said Nathaniel Gleicher, who served as director for cybersecurity policy at the White House National Security Council until last October. “That doesn’t mean that they’re going to take action sooner or later.” The administration insists it has improved its ability to respond quickly to cyberattacks, and officials increasingly say they support publicly calling out foreign nations that hack the United States. One administration official noted that it took just five weeks for President Barack Obama to impose economic sanctions against North Korea in response to the destructive late-2014 hacking of Sony Pictures. Yet current and former officials acknowledge that constructing a public response isn't an instant task. Merely preparing a declassified explanation of who perpetrated an attack or readying economic sanctions takes weeks. Bringing criminal charges — as the Justice Department has done with state-backed hacking suspects in Iran and China — can require years. And the U.S. has never leveled any official public reprisal for hacking by Russia, despite years of evidence that hackers linked to Vladimir Putin’s regime have carried out intrusions of the White House, State Department and Pentagon. The prospect of a lengthy wait is unnerving for Clinton supporters, who see potential repeats of last month’s mass release of Democratic National Committee emails as one of a handful of unpredictable curve that could still toss the White House to Donald Trump. Democrats have charged that the website WikiLeaks dumped the emails as part of a Russian effort to aid Trump, who has praised Putin and expressed doubts about U.S. commitments to allies in Eastern Europe. Russia has denied having anything to do with the DNC hacks or a separate breach aimed at donors to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. But if the U.S. concludes that Putin’s regime is to blame, a growing chorus of security hawks says the White House must make it clear that such meddling in the U.S. political system cannot stand. “If in fact you could definitively or strongly develop a case for attribution against Russia, that in fact the Russians should be confronted with it and we should confront them publicly with it,” former Obama administration National Security Adviser Tom Donilon said Thursday during a POLITICO Playbook breakfast. “I don’t think countries are paying a price for this kind of activities,” Stephen Hadley, who held the same post under George W. Bush, said at the same event. Calls for action have also come from several congressional Democrats and Republicans who serve on defense, law enforcement or intelligence committees, as well as a bipartisan group of 31 security and counterterrorism experts who urged Obama to “take prompt actions” that would “deter foreign actors from pursuing such tactics in the future.” www.politico.com/story/2016/08/clinton-democrats-hacking-dnc-october-surprise-226743#ixzz4GYUkItFh
|
|
|
Post by wildstubby on Aug 6, 2016 8:24:21 GMT -5
Finally Hillary speaks truthfully!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2016 8:39:36 GMT -5
Last surveys show a huge drop of Trump, and a it seems independent candidates are getting more and more attention. Especially among the young population (less than 30). Hillary seem to lead the race now overall. According to a Fox News August 3 survey (not exactly a liberal media): Trump vs Clinton: Clinton 49, Trump 39 General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson: Clinton 44, Trump 35, Johnson 12 And according to a NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl poll (dated Aug. 5): General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein: Clinton 43, Trump 34, Johnson 10, Stein 5 Ouch, 5 to 10 points behind Clinton for Trump. It's going to be tough. Some polls even show a 15 points difference. www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 6, 2016 9:06:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 6, 2016 9:25:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by caliconnection on Aug 6, 2016 19:48:33 GMT -5
Last surveys show a huge drop of Trump, and a it seems independent candidates are getting more and more attention. Especially among the young population (less than 30). Hillary seem to lead the race now overall. According to a Fox News August 3 survey (not exactly a liberal media): Trump vs Clinton: Clinton 49, Trump 39 General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson: Clinton 44, Trump 35, Johnson 12 And according to a NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl poll (dated Aug. 5): General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein: Clinton 43, Trump 34, Johnson 10, Stein 5 Ouch, 5 to 10 points behind Clinton for Trump. It's going to be tough. Some polls even show a 15 points difference. www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/president/Having seen the Republicans and Democrats elect Trump and Clinton, nothing would now surprise me with US politics. Go Johnson!
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 6, 2016 21:01:53 GMT -5
Libertarians should of elected Weld as their pres nominee. Johnson seems to be acting like a Star struck school kid and sucking up to hillary and the Koch Bros.Weld is staying on point.
|
|
|
Post by makopp5 on Aug 7, 2016 5:45:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 7:48:41 GMT -5
Libertarians should of elected Weld as their pres nominee. Johnson seems to be acting like a Star struck school kid and sucking up to hillary and the Koch Bros.Weld is staying on point. The problem is Weld isn't really a Libertarian. He is more a Liberal. (lets face it, he was Governor of Massachusetts) There was a big dispute at the conversion about making him the VP. Johnson does need to do some practicing before the debates. But if you want a polished politician Hillary is your woman.. People wanting smooth talking salesman is why we are here now. He isn't the best at presenting himself (but getting better) but has a great resume of accomplishments. If you saw the CNN town hall the other night he did improve from the earlier one. Still a lot of Libertarians not happy with many of his positions. Many saying he is just a lukewarm Libertarian.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2016 8:23:14 GMT -5
Trump could have won the election with a landslide had he been more careful with his comments, some of them were pretty ridiculous and unbecoming a future statesman. Right now a statement he made: "If we have the atomic bomb, why don't we use it!" has many folks upset, worldwide. Trump is his own worst enemy. I wish him well but don't have much hope that he can win. Libertarians should join up with Trump. They will never get the votes to win the election and all they're doing is help Hillary win.
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 7, 2016 9:32:45 GMT -5
CG please attache the full comment where Trump said we need to use the Atomic bomb.The Media is hoping all the uninformed voters will take little snippets that have been spun so much they would make a big enough spider web to hold a truck.
The Liberterian base has some good ideas and beleifs, to bad Johnson has left the reservation and went to the left politicly.
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 11:16:19 GMT -5
This will determine how much farther he makes it. thelibertarianrepublic.com/johnson-attend-town-hall-trump-clinton/A good performance will certainly put him in the debates. Seeing him on the same stage with Hillary and Trump will boost his name recognition. He only has a 35% name recognition with the latest pole putting him at 13%. 65% of the electorate dont even know who he is. Big opportunity to change that big time.
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 7, 2016 11:33:50 GMT -5
scumbuster you will have to copy and paste that report and any others that you want us to read from this site thelibertarianrepublic I will not join it to read it I will not do that for any Political Group.
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 11:43:07 GMT -5
I didn't join and can read it. I just follow the site on facebook and get them sent. I will put below. The Libertarian Republic has received news from a source wishing to remain anonymous that Gary Johnson has received an invitation to attend the Asian and Pacific Islander American Vote and Asian American Journalists Association 2016 Presidential Town Hall, taking place next Friday, August 12 at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas.
Most notably, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have each been invited as well. This would mark the first time that Johnson has had the opportunity to appear at an event alongside the other two major parties’ nominees. The town hall can be seen via livestream on the organization’s website. With the Libertarian ticket having already received the benefit of multiple nationally-televised town hall forums of its own, this news should be only the latest boost of momentum for Johnson and running-mate William Weld. Furthermore, if Johnson is finally able to receive a similar avenue to Trump and Clinton in answering questions, he can more easily compare and contrast himself with the other two candidates. Even the mere image of the three individuals appearing at the same event could help in legitimizing the former New Mexico Governor. The presidential town hall format could also serve as a “dress rehearsal” for the presidential debates. Though the Libertarians recently lost the opportunity for automatic inclusion in the debates due to an adverse court ruling, they could still very easily attain the 15% threshold required to receive an invitation. Johnson’s poll numbers have steadily climbed in recent months, as he reached 12% in both a recent FOX News poll and a recent Investor’s Business Daily poll. Both polls were released this week, and each places him within the margin of error of the ever-important 15%. This has all transpired against the backdrop of the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) suggesting that this 15% mark may be flexible, meaning that if a third-party candidate comes close enough, the CPD may be nonetheless willing to allow him or her onto the debate stage. During their most recent town hall, the Libertarian candidates seemingly shifted to a general election tone with their message. They offered harsh but reasonable critiques of Trump and Clinton and expressed a message of optimism for the country. Johnson and Weld did their best to position themselves as the “centrist” alternatives to an otherwise polarized field. Most pleasing to libertarians, however, they did so while espousing fairly solid libertarian principles, rarely straying from the guiding idea of their usual mantra: that government ought to stay out of Americans’ pocketbooks and bedrooms. The best news for the ticket may have been that the audience for the town hall was significantly larger than the one which tuned into the previous edition. The event did particularly well among younger voters, a demographic which is a natural fit for the Libertarians. If Governor Johnson is able to carry this same attitude into the presidential town hall in Las Vegas, he could easily turn some heads and draw some necessary attention to his campaign. The program should receive national press attention, and Johnson could then parlay this opportunity into a greater chance at gains in name recognition and poll numbers. No matter the outcome, the fact that Johnson is being granted this opportunity at all bodes well for his status in the race. It acknowledges that outside viewers are beginning to see the Libertarians as equals with the Democrats and Republicans in terms of electoral relevance. With each media appearance Johnson and Weld do, they move closer to not only the 15% required to participate in the presidential debates, but also the perhaps more important goal of 5% in the general election, necessary to allow the Libertarian Party to receive matching public funds and ballot access in future elections. thelibertarianrepublic.com/johnson-attend-town-hall-trump-clinton/#ixzz4GfK5jnVZ He has 5 days left to prepare.
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 11:49:15 GMT -5
BTW.. Watch Austin Peterson in 4 years. I believe he will be the next Libertarian nominated to run in 4 years. Very articulate and well spoken. Really has a good stage presents. I kinda wish it was him this year.
|
|
|
Post by livinginmedellin on Aug 7, 2016 11:52:24 GMT -5
Trump: You people really believed me?In a turn of events that shocked the political world and threw the presidential race into unprecedented turmoil, Donald J. Trump announced yesterday that he is quitting the race and endorsing Hillary Clinton. Trump said the only point of his campaign was to show how stupid and gullible many Republican voters are. “I’ve been a Democrat all of my adult life,” Trump told a packed and boisterous news conference. “But I knew if I ran as a Republican and said increasingly ridiculous, idiotic, racist and sexist things that I would get a lot of votes.” But he said he had no idea he would be able to win the Republican nomination and poll 40 percent or better in a national race against Clinton. “Did people really believe that I could build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico and get the Mexicans to pay for it?” Trump asked, “and that we could deport 11 million illegal aliens? That’s ridiculous. How could we possibly do that?” Trump said he wanted to show just how gullible the far-right wing was and how weak-kneed Republican leaders were. “Even after I made racist statements about that judge and attacked a Gold Star family, the Republican leadership continued to endorse me,” Trump said. “Man, what does it take to get tossed out of the Republican Party?” He also pointed out that he had offered no real solutions to any of the country’s problems and nobody, even the news media, took much notice that “there was no there there in my campaign,” he said. House Speaker Paul Ryan, while expressing shock at Trump’s announcement, said, “After I thought about it a bit, I realized this made a lot more sense then the campaign he was running. The joke’s on us.” Fifty-one Republicans immediately announced their candidacy to replace Trump on the ballot. Asked if he felt any remorse about fooling so many people, Trump answered in typical Trumpian style: “No. They’re all losers.” Read more here: www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/op-ed/article94019107.html#storylink=cpyLOL at this satirical article...
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 12:08:32 GMT -5
WikiLeaks Founder Promises More Clinton Emails, Dems Fear 'October Surprise' WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has promised to release more damning emails regarding the Clinton Foundation, and many Democrats are fearing it could lead to an "October surprise" for the Hillary Clinton campaign. Assange has been saying for some time that he has more emails that he will release before Election Day, but in a new interview with RT, he gave some hints at what information those emails might contain. insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/07/wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-promises-more-hillary-clinton-emails-october-surpriseWish he would just keep it secret and take them by surprise. Now she knows the subject and will have her string of lies all rehearsed.
|
|
|
Post by scumbuster on Aug 7, 2016 12:29:37 GMT -5
Debate Commission May “Give An Inch” to 3rd Party for 15% One of the keys to getting elected as President of the United States of America is to first participate in the presidential debates. However, actually getting into the debates has almost always been a problem with “third party” candidates. Gary Johnson, who is currently the closest by far to reaching the minimum debate commission requirements of 15% in polling, filed a lawsuit in September of last year to include both Libertarian and Green candidates in the debates. But the lawsuit may not be necessary for Gary Johnson to be included after all, as CNBC reports that Frank Fahrenkopf, co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, suggested the commission: … might consider giving an inch to a third-party candidate who is close enough to the cutoff point. This is following Republican Nominee Donald Trump’s complaints about the debates using the term “rigged”, even though the commission set the debate schedule over a year ago. Trump is complaining about two scheduled debate dates while the “minor” parties have complained for decades that there is an active effort to keep them out of the debates entirely, especially after recently raising the requirements to 15% in polls while commonly being unmentioned in the actual polling. Trump has enjoyed the republican party’s “major” party status, to always being mentioned in the polls, and yet voices dissatisfaction beyond the privileged polling to the debate commission. However, he may have triggered the commission to show some leniency to a “third party” in response to a growing concern of “minor” parties feeling “blocked” from the debates. This act of good faith may actually help put out some of the negative images the bipartisan commission has received concerning a “rigged” system for many others if this reach is actually extended to include a “third party” candidate. However, Trump may not want to share the debate stage with what he describes as “fringe” candidates. If he’s complaining about two dates, wouldn’t he also complain about sharing his speaking time? It appears the commission’s more important concerns may be to become more generous to “minor” party complaints rather than a couple of dates that were scheduled over a year ago. Also, it may be considered less “rigged” if there was a future tripartisan, rather than just a bipartisan commission consisting of only the two current “old” parties. thelibertarianrepublic.com/third-party-included-presidential-debate/
|
|
|
Post by dandl93 on Aug 7, 2016 13:58:34 GMT -5
Debate Commission May “Give An Inch” to 3rd Party for 15% One of the keys to getting elected as President of the United States of America is to first participate in the presidential debates. However, actually getting into the debates has almost always been a problem with “third party” candidates. Gary Johnson, who is currently the closest by far to reaching the minimum debate commission requirements of 15% in polling, filed a lawsuit in September of last year to include both Libertarian and Green candidates in the debates. But the lawsuit may not be necessary for Gary Johnson to be included after all, as CNBC reports that Frank Fahrenkopf, co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, suggested the commission: … might consider giving an inch to a third-party candidate who is close enough to the cutoff point. This is following Republican Nominee Donald Trump’s complaints about the debates using the term “rigged”, even though the commission set the debate schedule over a year ago. Trump is complaining about two scheduled debate dates while the “minor” parties have complained for decades that there is an active effort to keep them out of the debates entirely, especially after recently raising the requirements to 15% in polls while commonly being unmentioned in the actual polling. Trump has enjoyed the republican party’s “major” party status, to always being mentioned in the polls, and yet voices dissatisfaction beyond the privileged polling to the debate commission. However, he may have triggered the commission to show some leniency to a “third party” in response to a growing concern of “minor” parties feeling “blocked” from the debates. This act of good faith may actually help put out some of the negative images the bipartisan commission has received concerning a “rigged” system for many others if this reach is actually extended to include a “third party” candidate. However, Trump may not want to share the debate stage with what he describes as “fringe” candidates. If he’s complaining about two dates, wouldn’t he also complain about sharing his speaking time? It appears the commission’s more important concerns may be to become more generous to “minor” party complaints rather than a couple of dates that were scheduled over a year ago. Also, it may be considered less “rigged” if there was a future tripartisan, rather than just a bipartisan commission consisting of only the two current “old” parties. thelibertarianrepublic.com/third-party-included-presidential-debate/This writer is the reason people are not listening to 3rd parties.He has a subject, Johnson getting into the debates and getting Johnson being talked about but has to make 2/3s of the articule about Trump.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 7, 2016 14:40:59 GMT -5
CG please attache the full comment where Trump said we need to use the Atomic bomb.The Media is hoping all the uninformed voters will take little snippets that have been spun so much they would make a big enough spider web to hold a truck. The Liberterian base has some good ideas and beleifs, to bad Johnson has left the reservation and went to the left politicly. I'm not aware of the full comment on the Atomic bomb, Dan, where can I find it?
|
|